Academia, Hyperreflexia, Memory, Missions, Neurological Disorders, Pain, Problems to Solve, Spasticity, Spinal Cord Injury, Writing

Spinal cord memory: a next step forward?

I study spinal cord injury (SCI). It’s been a journey I’ve taken for myself these past many years, 8 or so. There are some ideas that don’t leave you; they get stuck up there in the dark crevices, like a bit of juice in a city gutter. It’s a mix of all stuff you’ve read, heard, or thought about.

Here I am. I need to start somewhere with this. But, this has been on my mind for 2-3 years…. trying to flesh it out.

The brain is a computer.

As a computer, the brain has the biological mechanisms for storing information. We call this memory. The idea that the brain is a memory machine is old, ancient, really. It’s part of our everyday understanding of what the brain does. It takes information, processes it, then stores it for recollection (remembering) later.

Now, what most people don’t know is that the spinal cord also “remembers”. The spinal cord also contains the same machinery that the brain has when it comes to forming and storing information (i.e., memories).

I’ve been exploring the idea that memory can go wrong.

‘Memory is linked to pain’ is well understood, if you think about it. Do you remember what it’s like to get a paper-cut? More interesting, do you remember what it’s like to be betrayed by a friend, or feel guilty, forms of emotional pain?

Inside the spinal cord are memory systems. Injury or disease, like SCI, can disrupt these systems, putting them into a kind of over-drive. The neurons no longer process and output electrical information normally. Turn on the radio, you hear music. Switch to a channel that has no information, or poorly received information, and you get static. That’s what we call neuropathic pain in the most basic sense: the absence of good information and amplify whatever noise is left.

Maybe, the same thing is happening there in the motor system, the machine parts that control movement. While some people with SCI don’t feel any ability to move, they are weak or even paralyzed; there are other individuals with SCI that have too much movement. Their muscles do not react voluntarily, moving or twitching on their own (some may call this “dystonia” or “myoclonus”). The intensity of these muscle contractions, or twitchings, could be of such great intensity that it’s actually painful or uncomfortable. There’s no relaxation posture or state of the muscle; it’s constantly active.

Here’s what I think is going wrong. Like the analogy I used for neuropathic pain (see above), the electrical activity in the neurons that control muscles is abnormally activated. They are over-excitable, as we like to say in the field.

Why are they over-excitable, which causes them to make muscles contract involuntarily, even painfully?

So many reasons. No laundry lists here. Here’s my take on it the problem….

The body is alive. It is constantly healing itself against insults the world throws at it. Your skin regenerates automatically when you cut yourself. When you break a bone, the doctor doesn’t “heal” you, your body does. All the doctor does is make sure your bones heal themselves, correctly.

I tell you this so you know that the spinal cord does heal itself. We call this spontaneous regeneration. This happens all the time after SCI. For example, after the initial injury, a patient (or in my case, a rodent) undergoes a period of dramatically lost function, also known as spinal shockThis can be painful, uncomfortable (I’m using really weak adjectives, forgive me).

Overtime, however, the subject regains some function. This is due to two major things happening, we mostly think. First, balances of chemicals and electrical properties of the nervous system slowly return to a state where things that aren’t cut-off can function (albiet not 100%) and transmit information again. Second, those neuron that do survive and not directly injured by the SCI have an internal ability to spontaneously grow. Some types of cells are more capable than others, and certain chemicals need to be available, but generally, all neurons in the spinal cord have some capability, even in the adult, to grow or spontaneously regenerate.

Spontaneous regeneration, also known as reactive neuronal plasticity, appears to be a good thing. 

And it is. It’s the body’s self-healing process. But sometimes, it can go wrong. In my studies, I examine how the internal capability of neurons to spontaneously form new connections and regrow can lead to serious disorders after SCI. Using a broad brush explanation, for example, if a pain cell receives too many connections from the wrong place, then excess pain can be a result. The same is true for muscle function. If a cell receives too much information from a spontaneously regenerated nerve, then we might expect those muscles to have too much stimulation.

What bursts my mind is that this all happens internally, deep in the bowels of the spinal cord. Unlike a broken bone, in which a doctor can intervene by making a cast to hold the broken parts close together, allowing them to regenerate and heal back into the normal, original shape, we can’t do that with the broken spinal cord. Not yet.

It’s a musical orchestra in there….

There are many circuits that are impacted by SCI. We, as the research field, are struggling to dissect what wires go where. Let’s say…I take my laptop and throw it on the floor. It doesn’t break, not entirely, but the keyboard doesn’t work anymore. How do I know how to fix it, if I don’t know where all the wires are supposed to go?

I’m now looking at how my studies in neuropathic (nerve) pain are similar to what goes wrong in the motor system that leads to really annoying, painful, or uncomfortable problems. Many bodily systems require a huge orchestra of neurons working in concert with each other. I’m basically taking apart the orchestra, starting with the flute section.

Yes. Let’s play on.

Advertisements
Standard

8 thoughts on “Spinal cord memory: a next step forward?

  1. I gotta start reading more of your blog. The is the second one that has echoes of what I’ve been thinking about recently. Not so much with SCI, although what you’re saying makes me happy – my mother has MS, and so far, she’s one of the lucky ones, but I worry about how long that will last. If you can figure out how to help the spinal cord to fix itself, perhaps we’ll be closer to fixing what MS does to the myelin.
    But what really struck a chord (haha, chord, music…oh, never mind.) was when you said “the brain is really a computer”. Now, there are obvious reasons that people say this, there are a lot of similarities. But I was thinking of a dream I had the other night, which was chillingly similar to an experience I had some time ago, I was unwell, very much so, and everything seemed like I was watching an old nickelodeon in slow motion (penny arcade? anyone? OK, it was like watching photographs get flipped so that it looks like a moving picture, but they are taking their dear sweet time flipping the pictures).
    In any case, a dream I had was very similar, and it’s AWFULLY disorienting. I spent a good long time thinking about it today, and realized what was happening. In the first experience my vision slowed down. I only got glimpses, and it occured to me that the issue MAY be that the eyes send vision images, perhaps the same information is sent through a computer – in packets. With computers, it’s 1s and 0s. With our brain, possibly different, but you have the same concept.
    With that, I realized, in reality, computers work the way the do, most likely because we created them, and we had to create them… if you will excuse the term… in our own image.

  2. Reblogged this on My Unplanned Life… and commented:
    This is an outstanding explanation regarding spinal cord injuries and many of the problems that may follow (I have blogged about many of these medical issues during the past year). Written by a neuroscientist, I have to admit that I have tears in my eyes to know the help I need is actually being studied. Thank you ‘Neuro Vantage’ for your research and for the easy to understand blog about SCI.

      • Neurovantage,
        I am the husband of MSWestfall and I see how she seems to struggle saying what you have put into words in your post. Actually that is incorrect, she does convey these problems to the doctors and has since day one of her injury. They seem to stare as if they do not understand…..or believe her. It upsets me that the neurosurgeon who should have understood what happened during her surgery was sending her to numerous other physicians and subjecting her to tests for other neurological issues he knew she didn’t have. SCI patients live with pain daily, but I can hardly remember banging my funny bone until I do it again. Your description of this helped me understand better and I appreciate the work you are doing for my wife and all SCI injury patients! Keep researching and let me know when you get to the string section!

      • Thank you so much! I am so glad our paths crossed and we have gotten to know each other. You are helping me to understand my injury and giving me hope that help is on the horizon…if not for me so others won’t suffer from SCI and the problems that follow.

  3. This is very interesting, You’re a very professional blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look forward to in quest of more of your excellent post. Also, I’ve shared your
    site in my social networks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s